<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Price Friendly&#8221; vintage baseball cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cardboardicons.com/2009/12/14/price-friendly-vintage-baseball-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cardboardicons.com/2009/12/14/price-friendly-vintage-baseball-cards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rookie Card Showcase: 1960 Topps Jim Gentile &#171;</title>
		<link>http://cardboardicons.com/2009/12/14/price-friendly-vintage-baseball-cards/#comment-5043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rookie Card Showcase: 1960 Topps Jim Gentile &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardboardicons.com/?p=4829#comment-5043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] two weeks ago I obtained a 1961 Topps Jim Gentile card from one of my local card shop&#8217;s &#8220;Price Friendl.... I purchased the card with the intention of trading it, but later learned a bit about Gentile, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two weeks ago I obtained a 1961 Topps Jim Gentile card from one of my local card shop&#8217;s &#8220;Price Friendl&#8230;. I purchased the card with the intention of trading it, but later learned a bit about Gentile, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned hall</title>
		<link>http://cardboardicons.com/2009/12/14/price-friendly-vintage-baseball-cards/#comment-5031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ned hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardboardicons.com/?p=4829#comment-5031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[last topps card of ted williams last row 3rd from right]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last topps card of ted williams last row 3rd from right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olds</title>
		<link>http://cardboardicons.com/2009/12/14/price-friendly-vintage-baseball-cards/#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardboardicons.com/?p=4829#comment-4990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a lot of vintage stuff that&#039;s very undervalued in my mind these days -- because much of the mass collecting emphasis has shifted toward signed and other limited-edition cards. 

That said, low-end vintage condition-wise is very affordable, too -- particularly when the cards are not slabbed. (However, I&#039;d be cautious about some bigger-name cards that look good but aren&#039;t slabbed. One word: trimming.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of vintage stuff that&#8217;s very undervalued in my mind these days &#8212; because much of the mass collecting emphasis has shifted toward signed and other limited-edition cards. </p>
<p>That said, low-end vintage condition-wise is very affordable, too &#8212; particularly when the cards are not slabbed. (However, I&#8217;d be cautious about some bigger-name cards that look good but aren&#8217;t slabbed. One word: trimming.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

