Rookie Card Showcase: 1990 Leaf Frank Thomas

Posted in Newspaperman with tags , , , , , , , on December 18, 2009 by Newspaperman

This is part 17 of an ongoing series. To see the rest of this series, click here.

Before there was Albert Pujols, there was the Big Hurt Frank Thomas. Laugh all you want, but when Thomas was healthy, there was no better first baseman in the game. He was the game’s premier power hitter, and arguably the greatest hitter (in terms of average) of the early and mid 1990s. Every time he stepped to the plate, he was fixin’ to put a hurtin’ on the other team. His on-field success lead to extreme hobby status and this 1990 Leaf card was THE card to have. In an era where card were produced in the millions (or close to that anyway) the Leaf product of 1990 was considered the elite brand due to its “limited” nature. The Thomas card rivaled the 1989 Upper Deck Ken Griffey Jr. as the best active player rookie card to own at the time; each was being sold in excess of $75 at the time. To put that into perspective, boxes of basic cards like Topps and Donruss were still being sold for about $18 per. Thomas’ career was marred by injury starting in the late 1990s and his hobby status began declining as a result. (it should be noted that Thomas still has plenty of hardcore collectors willing to pay a pretty penny for the extremely rare cards) His Leaf rookie began showing up for discount prices; Gem Mint copies like the one shown here can be had for a little more than $20. That’s a hell of a collectible at a great price if you ask me.

CONTEST: Win a Josh Hamilton autograph

Posted in Newspaperman with tags , , , , , on December 16, 2009 by Newspaperman

I’ve recently reached a milestone of 75,000 page views. In honor of that, I will be giving away a Josh Hamilton autograph I received through the mail. Want the card? All you’ve got to do is leave a comment and tell me how you found this blog the first time. The contest will run through Dec. 24, Christmas Eve, and a winner will be randomly selected on Christmas Day. Good luck.

– Newspaperman

“Price Friendly” vintage baseball cards

Posted in Newspaperman with tags , , , , , , on December 14, 2009 by Newspaperman

For nearly 20 years I’ve been attending a certain baseball card shop in San Jose, Calif. It’s changed names since I was a kid, but the operator has remained the same. The owners own a chain of stores in the Bay Area, all of which I have been to numerous times. With time running short Monday, I made a quick trip to the closest one for some tobacco card size binder pages, which I didn’t know existed until late last week. Anyway, What I found near the sheets may end up being my new playground.

In the nearby showcase along with some awesome condition vintage cards were multiple boxes of “Price Friendly” vintage cards. These cards are not mint, and the prices on the Card Savers reflected that. Given my shortage of time (I had my dog sitting in the car otherwise I would have been there all day) I poured quickly through two boxes and left the other five for later this week. Here are four cards I purchased.

We’ll start with the Ruth card shown above. The 1962 Topps set is notorious for three things: The Roger Maris card (No. 1) that reflects the record-setting home runs he hit in 1961, the wood panel borders, and these Babe Ruth Special cards. Before Topps went Topps in recent years and killed Mickey Mantle even after he was already physically dead, Topps went to town on Babe Ruth, highlighting certain aspects of his life. On this card, which someone trimmed, it talks about his first years playing organized baseball at St. Mary’s Industrial School. I’m not a fan of these cards per se, but I am a HUGE fan of the price tag: $1. Plus, it’s Babe friggin’ Ruth.

While we’re on the topic of $1 cards, I might as well show two cards that I initially intended to trade. The first is this ho-hum 1951 Bowman card of Joe Hatten, a pitcher for the Brooklyn Dodgers. Hatten’s career is pretty indistinguishable, although he did make two Opening Day starts for the Dodgers in 1947 and 1949.The front of this card is not bad, albeit, no where near mint. The Back is pretty shady though thanks to some glue marks. Regardless, for a buck it was a nice purchase and should make blogging buddy Night Owl pretty happy given that it is a vintage Dodger. Night Owl, this card is heading your way this week … I hope.

One of the joys of team trading is that you often stop and look at cards that you likely wouldn’t even think twice about. Just as I did with the Hatten above, I purchased this 1961 Topps Jim Gentile (HI Series) fully expecting to trade it. But unlike the Hatten, I may end up keeping the Gentile for a few reasons. First off, this card lists Gentile as living in San Lorenzo, Calif., a small town I covered for a while when I started as a reporter for my current employer. Secondly, Gentile is noted on this card as having hit two “grand slammers” in one game. Yes, Grand Slammers. And lastly, wanna take a wild guess as to who finished third in the AL MVP voting the the year Mickey Mantle and Roger Maris slugged it out for the home run record? Yep, none other than Jim Gentile. Sadly, this is NOT his rookie, it’s his second-year card. It may have some paper loss and still have some tape stuck to the front, but this card is still a cool purchase for $1.

Let’s end this post on a cool note as I added another Boston Red Sox team card to my collection, this one a 1962 Topps. Unfortunately THIS card was the most expensive of the ones I bought today — a whopping $3. I have no neat stories to share about this card. The image shown here is so blurry that you cannot distinguish any of the players. And the 1961 Red Sox (the team depicted here) were a piss-poor team having finished 76-86, placing sixth in the AL. The only slightly cool thing about this card is that somewhere on here is Rip Repulski, who might have one of the coolest names in the history of the game. There were other Repulski cards in the boxes I went through, but none of them showed him as a Boston player.

Rookie Card Showcase: 1951 Bowman Nellie Fox

Posted in Rookie Card Showcase with tags , , , , , , , , , on December 14, 2009 by Newspaperman

This is part 16 of an ongoing series. To see the rest of this series, click here.

It takes a lot to make a vintage baseball card unappealing to me. Not even this Nellie Fox, displaying its 58 years of age with rounded corners and evidence of having been pasted to a sheet of paper, and possibly involved in a fire, could keep me away.

This card isn’t your prototypical personal collection card, but that’s OK — Fox wasn’t your prototypical Hall of Fame player. He was not an offensive powerhouse. His career batting average was only .288, and his CAREER home run total was less than the single season average for most of today’s sluggers. Fox was better known as a singles hitter, and a fine defensive player who garnered three Gold Gloves. He also has an MVP to his credit, and a World Series title, both of which he earned in 1959.

Fox was not elected into the Hall by the Baseball Writers of America, having missed in his final year of eligibility by one measly vote. Rather he was elected by the veteran’s committee in 1997, some 22 years after he died.

Doin’ Two Babes at the Same Time

Posted in Newspaperman with tags , , , , , , , , , on December 12, 2009 by Newspaperman

Made you look, didn’t I?

So here’s a hypothetical question I’ve been pondering as it pertains to my two Babe Ruth vintage cards: You’ve only got room for one of the pictured cards in your collection in the depicted condition. Which do you choose?

Your choices include a 1960 Fleer Babe Ruth in decent condition, off-center top to bottom and right to left, rounded corners and some surface wear; and a 1967 Topps Venezuelan Babe Ruth in horrible shape, akin to the remains of a bar of soap found in a single man’s shower.

Now before you answer, I want you to consider all the factors.

The ‘60 Babe Ruth is older, in nicer condition and features him in action, sorta. The back also has his career statistics (pitching and hitting), which is a big plus. It is a vintage Ruth, a card of which you can be proud to own. It’s decently valued at $100 in Beckett Baseball, but copies can be attained on eBay for about $20 in similar shape. For any collector, such a card would be a nice addition.

The ‘67 Ruth is newer and just beat to a pulp. It’s rough around the edges, the card contains FIVE corners because part of the card has fallen off, it’s got evidence of having been stapled to something, and the back is written in Spanish — no statistics. Beckett Baseball has it valued at $700. But here’s where things get tricky. You’re going to have a hard time finding this card on eBay. It was produced for the people in Venezuelan four decades ago. There has not been a copy of this card on eBay in forever.

Both cards are encapsulated and deemed authentic by Beckett Grading.

Knowing these factors, which do you decide is right for your collection: The more plentiful, better condition 1960 Fleer card, or the much rarer, yet worse condition, 1967 Topps Venezuelan?

Remember, we are only talking about the pictured cards in this condition. You MUST choose only one. The card you choose can and will be the only Babe Ruth vintage card you ever own.